Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(modal): add safari media query for overflow indicator #8510

Conversation

emyarod
Copy link
Member

@emyarod emyarod commented Apr 27, 2021

reported in #8495 (comment)

This PR separates Safari specific modal overflow indicator styles into a media query, in line with the implementation in code snippet and tabs

Testing / Reviewing

Confirm the modal overflow indicator appears correct when the hasScrollingContent prop is enabled

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 27, 2021

Deploy preview for carbon-elements ready!

Built with commit 6866e28

https://deploy-preview-8510--carbon-elements.netlify.app

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 27, 2021

Deploy preview for carbon-components-react ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables with commit 6866e28

https://deploy-preview-8510--carbon-components-react.netlify.app

Copy link
Collaborator

@tw15egan tw15egan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍 ✅

Copy link
Member

@aagonzales aagonzales left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit d65250c into carbon-design-system:main May 4, 2021
@emyarod emyarod deleted the modal-overflow-indicator-safari-media-query branch May 4, 2021 19:02
@tw15egan tw15egan mentioned this pull request May 10, 2021
22 tasks
@emyarod emyarod mentioned this pull request May 17, 2021
94 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants